Dan Wickett, who doesn’t need sleep apparently, has an interview with the editors of some fine literary journals. (One of these days I will add a section of links to lit journals to my sidebar. One of these days I tell you.) Included in the interview are the editors of Small Spiral Notebook and Land Grant College Review, both interesting journals.

Welcome to the Thunderdome! Sorry. But this is pretty cool in my opinion. The Morning News is starting a Tournament of Books. Their staff, plus Jessa Crisping of Bookslut, Maud Newton, and Mark Sarvas aka TEV will each read two books and determine the winner of the battle (at least I think that’s what’s happening). Powell’s is sponsoring it.
I kind of wish the whole thing were bigger though. More books, more judges (me for instance?). But I am eager to see the results.

Ahem, excuse me. I got a little choked up reading this article on the wonders that are good independent bookstores. Granted, this is from a paper in the UK, but I think applies here in the US as well. My store is very much like the London Review Bookshop. We “try to filter out some elements of the mass market which the chains are better equipped to promote.” We rely on good selection, good staff, and good atmosphere. And it’s worked. We’ve been around for over 70 years!

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention the great interviews that Dan Wickett has done with authors John Haskell and Dean Bakopoulos. I haven’t read either of them unfortunately, but now I really want to get their books.

Today Kafka on the Shore goes on sale. The Boston Globe reviewed it yesterday, saying among other things, “Indeed, in some respects this book is a primer on existentialism, but in Murakami’s capable hands, weighty philosophical matters are unpretentiously filtered down to a simple, poignant question posed by a boy who was abandoned by his mother, a man-child without moorings, who wonders, ‘All I know is that I’m totally alone . . . Is this what it means to be free?'”

I just returned from the reading at the First Parish Church where Jared Diamond spoke about his new book Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. He started by mentioning that he was born and raised in the area and attended Harvard. He told a few anecdotes about that. His accent may point to a Masachusetts upbringing as well, but I am not great at pinpointing them. And then he launched into a 35 minute breakdown of his book.
He started with the question of why write about how societies’ collapses? For him, it has always been one of the most interesting questions. Civilizations left behind are fascinating to teenagers. What can we learn from their fates?
Diamond then joked about the writing of the book itself and its publication. How interesting it is that his book shares the top 3 spots with books like the memoirs of Scott Peterson’s mistress and Jon Stewart. He’s a witty man—cracked a few jokes throughout the talk.
He chose several representative civilizations failures (Kakutani criticizes him in her review for the arbitrary nature of these choices, I think rather unfairly). Why do some civilizations collapse and others survive? Why do some recognize and solve their problems and others fail to see problems and go over a cliff?

He proposes a five point framework for why societies fail:
1. Societal impact on the environment—deforestation, overfishing, erosion, etc. This, by itself, is never the only cause.
2. Climate change. Again, not by itself a cause of collapse.
3. Enemies: hostile neighbors take advantage when a civilization is weakened by environmental changes and see a chance to take over.
4. Friends: trade partners can also damage as much as an enemy.
5. Political/Economic/Social cultures

A case in point is Easter Island, an extremely remote island in the Pacific (Europeans reached it in 1723) made famous for its huge stone statues built on a tree-less island without modern tools. Archaeological evidence shows that the island was once covered with forests. The islanders chopped down trees to create gardens, build canoes to fish the ocean and to build tools. By the end of the 17th century, all the trees were gone. They could no longer fish the seas and once they wiped out the animal life, there was only one animal left—humans. And as the food disappeared, agression between tribes rose and statues were knocked over. Ecological disaster set the stage for cultural implosion.

The opposite extreme was Greenland, settled by Norwegians who created a Christian civilization for over 450 years. The Inuit also lived on Greenland. The Norwegians lived on cattle and deer, the Inuit on fish. In the end, the Norwegians’ refusal to eat fish brought about the starvation of the people, while the Inuit thrived and managed to take over the island: one society made choices to survive, and one made choices that doomed them.
Diamond also spoke about big businesses—how in the past dozen years, he’s realized that some are good and some are bad (I think that previously he had regarded them as all bad). We need to figure out what motivates a company and praise the good ones before criticizing the bad ones. Also, people have a tendency to isolate themselves in First world nations now with gated communities, sending their kids to private schools, using private health care and private retirement funds. This shelters them from seeing and addressing societal problems like social security, etc. US isolation and our core value of consumerism has become dangerous in a nation where our resources have become finite.
He stated at the end that he was a cautious optimist. We have serious problems of our own making, which we can solve if we choose to. Media is a powerful resource at our disposal: we can learn from mistakes and disasters around the world, both past and present. I was glad to hear that he felt our problems were solvable, and that he wasn’t just another doomsayer.

Questions from the audience: Did he have opinions on the decline and fall of Greece and Rome? (Yes, they also matched his five-point outline for societal collapse.)
How about the decline of Russia and the USSR as superpowers? (Same.)
Could he go into more depth on multinational corporations? (They are a potent force in the world, and if they wish to survive they will have to act for the greater good, to preserve the world in which they exist. For example, Home Depot decided it was in their long term interest to purchase only sustainably-harvested lumber. He added that consumers can influence corporations through educated purchasing.)
How about the role of media? (A source of optimism for him: it can cause problems when incorrect information is spread, but it can also serve as a spur to societal progress and improvement.)
Was religion a help or hindrance? (He didn’t want to generalize; it depends on the society.)
Had he seen misguided conservation efforts? (Sure, lots. Australia introduced cane toads to control pests, but it’s become an unstoppable menace.)
How about war? (War falls under the “enemies” category of the societal collapse model.)
Overpopulation? (Yes, overpopulation is a major problem. The book closes with 12 problems we need to address, including overpopulation and per-capita consumption and waste).

I just want to remind everyone that Jared Diamond will be discussing Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed at the First Parish Church in Harvard Square at 6:30 tonight.
In fact, there are a number of great events this season. In February, we have among others Malcolm Gladwell, Adam Hochschild, Louis Menand, and Peter Carey. In March, Jorie Graham and Richard Parker. In April, Ian McEwan, Jonathan Safran Foer, Camille Paglia, Jeannette Winterson, and Ruth Reichl. And we are ending our event season with a real big one–David McCullough. I am going to try and attend as many of these as possible and report back.

The Chicago Tribune has a nice article on Jessica Crispin, the lady behind Bookslut.
” In a sea of competing Internet voices, Bookslut.com has distinguished itself through snarky, literate book reviews, thoughtful author interviews and a trend-tracking blog that attracts between 5,500 and 6,000 visitors daily.”
(Wow, that’s a lot of visitors. Now I am jealous.)

It’s just really disturbing. I don’t think torture is necessary in any case, no matter what and I know that a lot of people disagree with this. People I know, who are prefectly reasonable, have told me that if it prevents more terror attacks, torture is justified. I just can’t stomach it. The pictures from Abu Ghraib show people enjoying themselves too much. And I refuse to believe that it is just a few ‘bad apples’. Once you start letting ‘small’ things slide, it becomes easier and easier to let other things go as well. It’s just too easy. So no one should be allowed to do it. I’m sure many disagree. But hey, this is America. We’re allowed to disagree with one another still, right?

Okay, that post title is lame. Sorry about that. Just wanted to mention to anyone in the Boston/Cambridge/Somerville area that Jared Diamond will be speaking at the First Parish Church here in Harvard Square on Friday at 6:30. There is certainly nothing rough about Jared Diamond nor Harvard Square. Tickets aren’t required either.