Monthly Archives: August 2004

Everyone should read this

Geoffrey O’Brien has a wonderful piece in the New York Review of Books on Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11. Regardless of your politics, I think it is an important movie and O’Brien expresses the reason why:

Fahrenheit 9/11 serves as a necessary reminder that, to put it in the simplest terms, we need to see and hear more than the government and the various news channels allow us to see and hear. We need to play back the tapes to refresh our memory of what seems consigned to instant oblivion even as it unfolds. We need to see those images —of Americans and Iraqis alike wounded and dying, for example— that American television tends to withhold, as if the reality of the war could thereby be kept at bay. Michael Moore’s version of what has been happening lately is only one possible narrative; but by its very existence it encourages a more active, more confrontational approach to the images that surround us, anything to break through the numbing effect of the endless flow of TV news broadcasts and official bulletins that has become something like the wallpaper of a distorted public reality, a stream of images that moves forward without ever looking back.

I think that most people know I am fairly liberal. I don’t care for Bush or his administratin. I don’t like the war. So I admit I am biased. But I think everyone should see this movie. Not to convince them about Bush, but so that everyone can see what the media has done. How they have manipulated and filtered what we see every day. How we have no real good source for news anymore. How biased they are one way or the other. I think Moore’s movie, regardless of the politics, and the record numbers of attendence, show that Americans are willing to deal with hard hitting news. We do not need or want to be pandered to nor coddled. We want the honest facts so we can make up our own minds.
So read the above article for an honest assessment of Moore’s movie.

The fiction reviews are even fiction

Carrie over at Tingle Alley has posted two great letters to Sam Tanenhaus, editor of the NYT Book Review, and Leon Wieseltier, literary editor of the New Republic. Mr. Wieseltier reviewed Nicholson Baker’s latest novel Checkpoint which arrives in stores on Tuesday. If you have not heard of this book, it is causing quite a stir, as Baker’s main characters is plotting the assassination of GW Bush.
Tanenhaus, new to the Book Review, maintains that they still review fiction and cites this review as an example. I don’t know about you, but this review certainly does not qualify as a true fiction review. The author obviously has politics on his mind. Nowhere does he mention Baker’s credentials or other books nor does he even say whether it is well-written or not. Read Tanenhaus’ response to TEV’s letter complaining about the review.

Update: Beatrice has posted an actual review of Checkpoint, one worth reading.

Nobody wants the truth?

Everyone predicted Bill Clinton’s memoir as the summer’s hottest book. It sold predictably—fast out of the gate, but slower around the bends. Meanwhile, the 9/11 Commission Report is one of the fastest selling books at my store ever (I do not know this for sure without checking records, but I am reasonalby sure). I suppose I just find it interesting that more people want to read what I imagine is a dry government document than the sexy memoirs of an ex-president. Just goes to show you what the book people know. That is, not much.

Laaaaamme

From NY Post page 6:
“NATALIE Portman tried to get her “Vote for John Kerry” message out to the masses last week, but she was stymied. Arriving from Boston, where she attended the Democratic National Convention, Portman was scheduled to tout her “Garden State” on “The Charlie Rose Show,” “Good Morning America” and CBS’s “The Early Show.” She showed up in a Kerry T-shirt, but only Rose let it be seen on-air. According to the movie’s publicity people, “GMA” tried to cover up her shirt by strategically placing a flower pot in front of the pro-Kerry logo while “The Early Show” cameras only showed Portman from the shoulders up to avoid spreading the message. ”
I suppose they can claim they were trying to remain objective, but somehow I don’t think that was going through their minds.
On a side note, I used to see Natalie Portman on a daily basis. She lived in the building where my office is located.

Pinchy!

As several other blogs have mentioned, David Foster Wallace has a story on the Maine Lobster Festival (or MLF–a great abbreviation by the way) in the August issue of Gourmet magazine. Now, DFW seems an odd choice for this magazine, but I had to read his article. It was definitely an intriguing and well-written, but almost seemed like two separate articles—one on the actual MLF (snicker) and one on the ethics of eating lobsters. The latter half was the most thought provoking as he debunks the myth that lobsters feel nothing. Today the Boston Globe has an article today on the Gourmet article and the controversy it is causing. Typically thoguh, in Boston Globe fashion, the article is short and does not say too much one way or the other. Unfortunately, the Gourmet article is not available online, but maybe I will post some of the good excerpts from it later.

Check it out.

Maud Newton has a great interview with A.L. Kennedy today.

The only quibble I have with the Guardian is when they try to get me to write less about Iraq than I’d like to. They’ve never toned me down. Then again, they do like pieces with edge and, frankly, will publish frothing nonsense, so long as it might annoy someone – so I don’t really sit back and think that my burning truth is irrestible and sweeps me into their pages by right. (Plus, our news climate is still less conservative than yours – although ludicrously hidebound if your read European papers or watch European TV) I don’t have to wait to be angry – I get news by email for the US/Israel/Sudan/Iraq/etc every day – so I’m angry every day. People dying for no good reasons really annoys me for some reason.

Just so you know who you are dealing with here.

I think it is time I revealed some information about myself as I think there may be some confusion out there. My blog name is Bookdwarf, but I am not, in fact, a dwarf or little person. It is just a name. I am 5’6″ to be precise. And a girl! And yes, I do work at a bookstore, but not as a ‘clerk’. I work in the office as the backlist buyer. I am a Virgo and will be turning 29 soon. I have spent my whole life on the eastern side of the US, some in the Deep South (no accent) and some in New England (no Boston accent as of yet). I went to a small liberal arts college and tried going to graduate school for Classics. We didn’t agree with one another. And that is me in a few lines.

At least I am not that evil?

The Dante’s Inferno Test has banished you to the Sixth Level of Hell – The City of Dis!
Here is how you matched up against all the levels:

Level Score
Purgatory (Repenting Believers) Very Low
Level 1 – Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers) Very Low
Level 2 (Lustful) Very High
Level 3 (Gluttonous) High
Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious) Moderate
Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy) Very High
Level 6 – The City of Dis (Heretics) Very High
Level 7 (Violent) Very High
Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers) High
Level 9 – Cocytus (Treacherous) High

Take the Dante’s Inferno Hell Test

Thanks to TEV and Bondgirl for the link.

What every city dweller needs…

I found this link on Cup of ChicaUrban Asshole Notification Cards. They are all colorful and look like a regular greeting card. On the back, they have a list of objectionable things for you to check off for your asshole. I want to give them to those MASSPIRG assholes who ask me everyday on my way to lunch, “Do you have a few minutes for the environment?” Did I have time yesterday? No. Do you want money from me? Yes. Can I afford to give it to you? No. Stop talking.

The Late George Apley by John P. Marquand

It seems I am not the only one to have picked up a George Apley book recently. I did a lot of things last week to occupy my mind including reading a lot of books and seeing a lot of movies. Marquand’s book is one I finished and I have to say I think it is brilliant. It takes a while for you to realize the tone the author has taken. At times it seems like a serious tribute to a Boston blueblood, but there is this impish tone that comes through in Marquand’s writing. Plus I enjoyed reading about the city in which I live. Boston seems so caught in the past sometimes. Often it feels like the city has one foot in the past and one foot in the future and you don’t know what direction she wants to step.
The Late George Apley is a fascinating portrait of a man caught between lives. Born into an aristocratic family, George Apley was being groomed for a life even before he was born. His feeble attempts at rebellion are sad and you long to shake him out of his stupor. George Apley falls in love with a woman not of his social class, named Mary Monahan. And even though she is a respectable woman in her own circle, their love cannot be. In his love letters to her, you see a glimpse of the man behind the curtain:

Darling: —-
Once and for all I want you to know that I mean every word I tell you. I never knew how dull existence was until I saw you. If your father is worried by my attitude towards you, I think I had better spearl to him myself. I shall gladly tell him what I have told you, that I love you adn want to marry you, and I shall try all my life to make you happy. If my own family were to see how sweet you are, how unuterrably beautiful, they would want it, too. Believe me, believe me, eveything I say I mean….

A brilliantly and subtly written book about a life full of disappointment and regret, Marquand wrote a great satire about Boston brahims. One that even the brahmins believed in apparently.